On Friday 13 June 2008 10:55, Michael Rogers wrote:
> Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * Michael Rogers <m.rogers at cs.ucl.ac.uk> [2008-06-13 00:44:13]:
> >
> >> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >>> Interesting paper, tends to back up the assumptions we've been making
> >>> mostly... I'm not sure how much it directly applies to those trying to
use
> >>> darknet cell networks though...
> >> I guess we could use fproxy warnings to encourage people to use the
> >> clique/delegation defences: "You have more than 50 darknet friends. To
> >> prevent the network from becoming over-reliant on your node, please
> >> encourage some of your friends to connect to each other."
> >>
> >
> > We already have such a warning :)
>
> Good to know we're ahead of the cutting-edge research. ;-)
Well it doesn't exactly say that, it could probably be improved:
This node has too many connections (${count} > ${max}). Adding large numbers
of nodes automatically does not produce a small-world topology, hurts
routing, and risks producing single points of failure.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080613/b3d02103/attachment.pgp>
