On Thursday 26 June 2008 03:26, Daniel Cheng wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:16 AM, <toad at freenetproject.org> wrote: > > Author: toad > > Date: 2008-06-25 20:16:53 +0000 (Wed, 25 Jun 2008) > > New Revision: 20715 > > > > Modified: > > branches/db4o/freenet/src/freenet/client/async/SingleBlockInserter.java > > Log: > > More activation > > > > IMHO, we are modifying too many classes for this. > Have you look at the bytecode instrumentation TA in db4o 7.x?
I need the db4o collections, 7.x makes them deprecated. Apart from that, using the stable code is IMHO reasonable. Only the client layer is being affected by activation, deactivation, database updating etc. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080626/59e6df41/attachment.pgp>
