xor a ?crit :
>
>>> + public ObjectSet<OwnIdentity> getAllOwnIdentities() {
>>> + // FIXME: Implement this, needed by FMS.
>>> + throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
>>> + }
>> Oops, this is not really the way the plugin is supposed to be used.
>> Explaination follows.
>>
>> The client is supposed to know which identity he uses. If we
>> provide such feature, this is an anonymity breach. Example :
>>
>> I'm sharing my freenet node with someone that is on the same
>> LAN (because of bandwith limitation). We can keep each other
>> inserts/downloads secret by not using the public queue. If a
>> client is able to ask for every own identities, I can easily
>> know what are my friend's identities.
>
> You are right.
> But the function was not meant to expose all identities to the
> public on the webinterface. I will provide some way of
> authentication.
What about modifying my OwnIdentity object to add a password string ?
You could then use something like OwnIdentity.getByCred(nickname,password)
If it is OK for you, I will try to write it this week-end.
> Instead, what I want is to be able to use instances of the
> WoT-classes directly in FMS. FMS/WoT needs to be fast even
> if there are 10000 identities. Therefore, we cannot use
> FCP or SimpleFieldSet. It would require lots of memory
> and a lot of copying stuff around.
Oh. I didn't thought it was going to create such overload. If you think
it is necessary, go for it.
>>> + public ObjectSet<Identity> getAllIdentities() {
>>> + // FIXME: Implement this, needed by FMS.
>>> + throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
>>> + }
>>> +
>> Client should not ask for every identities but only for those
>> he is interrested in. IE : those that are in his context and
>> that have a positive score. This is what GetIdentitiesByScore
>> FCPplugin message is for :
>
> That function was a quick-shot, I did not really think about it.
> GetIdentitiesByScore is exaclty what I need. But as a direct
> function call from FMS, not as FCP.
>
>> Generally, a client should not try to store the entire WoT :
>> it should ask regularily to the WoTplugin. It is less work
>> for the client developper and a guarantee of using up-to-date
>> informations.
>
> I know this and I want to avoid ANY copying of data from WoT.
> It will be something like that:
>
> class FMSIdentity {
> private Identity wotIdentity;
> ...
> }
So, you are planning to get a connection to my database file and use my
methods to access it ? Do I understand it right ? If so, we will
definitely need some synchronisation, or even a server thread to avoid
database corruption.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20081105/807c3c66/attachment.pgp>
