On Thursday 11 September 2008 16:16, Daniel Cheng wrote: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:29 PM, <toad at freenetproject.org> wrote: > > Author: toad > > Date: 2008-09-10 12:29:22 +0000 (Wed, 10 Sep 2008) > > New Revision: 22578 > > > > Modified: > > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/Node.java > > Log: > > Make Opennet an advanced setting. There is no reason for normal users to care about it given that the security level automatically enables or disables it. > > > > "interrupt" asked a question on freenet-svn board in FMS, > concerning this commit. > > | From: interrupt at 04RAn8gPQ~Cd7zGHkzui-Vz0jW-YNNLwfUnj5zI8i3I > | Newsgroups: freenet-svn > | Subject: Re: r22578: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/Node.java > | Date: Wed, 10 Sep 08 13:42:07 -0000 > | > | Would the security level switch to "Custom" if the opennet status would > | be changed manually?
No. But if you don't change the security level you can tweak the settings manually however you like. Would it be a good idea? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080911/fdd1e36e/attachment.pgp>
