On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 12:47 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote: > I know some people are religiously opposed to using the command-line > git client, but I think those people are mistaken. I used to think > that I couldn't survive without Subclipse, but when I migrated to git > I thought I'd bite the bullet and use the command line. > > I quickly grew accustomed to it, and especially with stuff like git > bash completion (http://budurl.com/8gyy), and some bash prompt magic > (http://budurl.com/e6ma), I've found I'm very productive at the > command line. > > I now have little desire to switch back to a gui source control tool. > > Ian. >
I consider learning command line usage for stuff for which a GUI can be used as a waste of my personal lifetime and will not do so, I'd rather sit in the sun or listen to music or hang out with friends or whatever. We're in 2009 and graphical IDEs ought to be able to do the revision control, if that does not work then the wrong revision control system or IDE is being used. It is really not like revision control is something new, it has to be possible with GUI, it's been there for ages! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090429/e31940b6/attachment.pgp>
