Why? It's faster. It's better than before.
On 1/19/09, Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote:
> On Sunday 18 January 2009 23:25, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
>> Now with 1201, I have 66KB/s input / 72KB/s output : increase of 100%.
>
> This is somewhat worrying. :|
>>
>> On 1/18/09, xor <xor at gmx.li> wrote:
>> >
>> > Before #1201, it was always about 50 KiB/s of the 100 KiB/s which
>> > Freenet
> is
>> > allowed to use. Now it has increased:
>> >
>> > # Total Input: 1.25 GiB (51.3 KiB/sec)
>> > # Total Output: 1.63 GiB (66.9 KiB/sec)
>> > # Payload Output: 1.20 GiB (49.5 KiB/sec)(74%)
>> >
>> > Success rates
>> > Group P(success) Count
>> > All requests 5.361% 385,559
>> > CHKs 10.695% 163,400
>> > SSKs 1.439% 222,159
>> > Local requests 5.472% 51,736
>> > Remote requests 5.344% 333,823
>> > Block transfers 93.023% 31,861
>> > Turtled downstream 46.807% 1,801
>> > Transfers timed out 0.056% 1,801
>> > Turtle requests 75.191% 262
>> >
>> > Detailed timings (local CHK fetches)
>> > Successful 18.467s
>> > Unsuccessful 11.046s
>> > Average 11.292s
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Devl mailing list
>> > Devl at freenetproject.org
>> > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devl mailing list
>> Devl at freenetproject.org
>> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>>
>>
>
