On Saturday 25 July 2009 20:48:05 Zero3 wrote: > Matthew Toseland skrev: > > On Wednesday 22 July 2009 15:41:54 brendan at artvote.com wrote: > >> Just curious, whom exactly does the 4 digit number benefit? Do users care > >> about this number? And if so why? (Sorry if these are dumb questions. Just > >> trying to wrap my head around the issue:) > >> -Brendan > > > > Basically the problem is the CDN we use (Google Code). A filename should > > uniquely identify its contents, when we change the contents we should > > change the filename. > > > > Is FreenetInstaller-0.7.5.1224.exe a problem? > > IMHO an installer should always contain the version number in its name > so that there is no doubt about which version it contains.
Yes, except possibly for download-the-installer-from-freenet? If it's fetched from the web interface we could do it there too though... > > The name sounds fine to me. > > - Zero3 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090725/0423a0c4/attachment.pgp>
