On Wednesday 03 June 2009 20:21:46 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > On Wednesday, 3. June 2009 19:08:07 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Web hosting (of static files). Sourceforge provide this, and it should > > perform well. If there is no dynamic code there should be no administrative > > overhead. > > They don't allow generating money from the webhosting, so SF can't solve > static websites. But that can easily be found elsewhere, too.
Can you elaborate on this? Are you saying that the only way to take donations with sourceforge is through sourceforge's donations system? That could cost us a significant amount of money... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090604/02e2feda/attachment.pgp>
