On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:41 AM, Ian Clarke<ian at locut.us> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Matthew > Toseland<toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: >> On Thursday 04 June 2009 17:08:22 Ian Clarke wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Matthew Toseland >>> <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: >>> > What bug tracker should we use? Trac? Jira? Lighthouse? Something else? >>> >>> I vote for ?lighthouse. ?I've used Mantis, Trac, and Fogbugz, and >>> Lighthouse is better than all. ?It is simple, user friendly, doesn't >>> impose any particular way of working, and it has a flexible API. >> >> How is it different to Mantis then? > > The most obvious thing is a much nicer UI. ?You can tag bugs to > categorize them, and it makes it easy to specify relationships between > bugs - you just mention them, like "Depends on #234" - it will create > a by-directional link.
Sorry, not mantis got tags too. -- just nobody but me is using it. > >> Is there any chance of importing our existing bugs into Lighthouse? > > It has an API, and there is a conduit for Trac, but none for Mantis > that I'm aware of, so we'd probably need to hack together a script. There is a SOAP api. > > Ian. > > -- > Ian Clarke > CEO, Uprizer Labs > Email: ian at uprizer.com > Ph: +1 512 422 3588 > Fax: +1 512 276 6674 > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl >
