On Tuesday 12 May 2009 00:45:54 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> commit f86448d51c2e3248e1dfec513eefde50902aac30
> Author: Daniel Cheng (???) <j16sdiz at freenetproject.org>
> Date:   Fri May 8 21:04:28 2009 +0800
> 
>     FreenetStore: Simplify code, remove "overwrite" parameter
> 
>     This parameter is always "false".
>     (Except when doing BDB->SaltedHash migration, which does not have to 
> overwrite)
> 
> 
> The reason I introduced the overwrite parameter was that when we send an SSK 
> insert and get a DataFound with different data, we should not only propagate 
> the data downstream, but also replace our local copy of it. However 
> apparently I never implemented this. Is it a good idea?
> 
Looks like we do store the collided data for a local insert 
(NodeClientCore.java:XXX we have collided), but not for a remote one. Except 
that a bug prevents the former from working. So we need to fix getBlock(). 
Ok...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090512/6c3b0962/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to