On Saturday 13 March 2010 23:11:32 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> We need to get rid of uservoice. A spammer has registered an account and is 
> posting 50-100 spams per day. Good anti-spam tools are only available if we 
> pay for a Bronze account.
> 
> Any good alternatives? Basically we need an easy to use system for users to 
> tell us what is important to them. This should include forums and voting. And 
> the ability to delete spamming users along with all their spam! Our current 
> bug tracker is *not* acceptable: it is not easy to use, it has an 
> intimidating user interface. Uservoice is not acceptable because of spam. A 
> hosted ( = third party) solution is acceptable. Something we run ourselves is 
> acceptable provided it is packaged in debian.
> 
Uservoice has been reinstated. The spam attacks continue but the automated spam 
controls seem to be picking it up, so it only needs occasional moderator 
attention ... hopefully.

Meanwhile, the top 5 remain:
- Write a killer file-sharing application
- one GUI for all
- Add a 'pause' feature
- Implement reinsert on demand
- use the port 80,443,53,1863 for comunication

Which IMHO corresponds to the following planned features/areas:
- Better filesharing: better searching and better data persistence, and *maybe* 
insert on demand.
- More functionality in the web interface.
- Faster opennet bootstrapping, and maybe pause mode.
- Transport plugins.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100401/05ffff13/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to