This was some time back, so it might not be a comment on the current website. However, he may have a point? One of the responses, from Dennis Nezic, was basically that Freenet is complex, deal with it. However we could make it a bit clearer that Freenet is a metanetwork, that it is NOT a proxy network, but that it's still useful because XYZ? Or is that too negative a point of view - I guess that depends on how good our XYZ are? -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Tim Jones <[email protected]> Subject: [freenet-support] I Like the Idea but.... Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:58:19 -0500 Size: 5212 URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100402/af86ada6/attachment.mht> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100402/af86ada6/attachment.pgp>
