On Monday 02 August 2010 15:34:21 cvollet at gmail.com wrote: > Hello all, > > I was wondering if we should insert the website on Freenet, and what could > be the advantages.
We should, but there is one critical disadvantage. People would trust it. And then the insertion key gets leaked, and really bad things happen. The solution to this is Revocable Subspace Keys, which have been planned for a long time but not yet implemented. > > Advantages I see right now : > > 1) Darknet users can visit the site without telling others they're > interested in Freenet. > 2) The website may be (is?) blocked in some countries. Well, mostly you don't need to visit the site if you're already on Freenet. We already provide the installers over Freenet. Ideally you'd be able to access the wiki and source code over Freenet ... there are tools for this already but we're not using them yet, and they have some fairly serious issues ... > 3) It creates an entry point for newbies, and they can navigate the website > and the documentation in-freenet. True. > 4) We have an official way to inform users in Freenet (Freetalk/FMS/Frost > aren't used by all the freeneters I assume). This links in to the trust issue above. > 5) Your idea here. > > It should be too hard to automatize, but it needs a node up and running. It would not be difficult to implement once we have the prerequisites. > > Dieppe. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100802/ec747025/attachment.pgp>
