On Tuesday 03 August 2010 09:02:33 xor wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 August 2010 09:50:05 am xor wrote:
> > On Friday 30 July 2010 01:05:30 am Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > Any suggestions for what we should link to? It looks like both TUFI and
> > > the Activelink Index sites have not been updated recently? Criteria: A
> > > site must be useful for finding stuff on Freenet. It must be easy to use
> > > and ideally have descriptions. It must not be likely to lead newbies to
> > > places where they don't want to go without warning them i.e. it must must
> > > clearly label evil content.
> > >
> > > We are #2 on Sourceforge's "What's Hot" for security on Linux. And we're
> > > consistently rising at the moment. Have I missed a significant press
> > > article?
> >
> > Quoting from a Freetalk thread called:
> > "Who do I have to kill to get on the front page?"
> > At the moment I don't filter the links, just the ActiveLinks, so you
> > don't
> > accidentally download any kiddie porn via an AL, but I can do a filtered
> > version of the site if required, removing all the porn. I could perhaps
>
> The non-activelink version looks better. I will tell him via Freetalk that he
> should provide a version of the non-activelink site which does not provide
> child porn so we can add it to the default bookmarks.
>
We cannot require the exclusion of child porn, or we will be forced to exclude
ALL illegal content. We must only choose indexes on the basis of how useful
they are for a new user trying to find stuff. That is our policy. However,
usefulness includes accurate labelling (and maybe categorisation) and not
accidentally running into something horrible.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100803/98e47e01/attachment.pgp>
