-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'd say "Contact Kaspersky", they've been pretty responsive to such issues with a project I'd worked on a couple of years ago.
Regards, Victor Denisov. Christian Funder Sommerlund (Zero3) wrote: > With the help from ermanno, I've tracked down the reasons for failed > Windows installs with Kaspersky. > > He was able to confirm that Kaspersky (at least on XP) falsely detects > the installer as PDM.Worm.P2P.generic. Googling this reveals that it's a > common bad heuristic that catches all kinds of things (for example: > Adobe's Flash Player uninstaller). > > On top of my head, I see two posibilities: > > 1) Kaspersky finds the node code and realizes that this is indeed some > kind of P2P. > > 2) Kaspersky freaks out over the local port scan the installer does to > find a free fproxy and fcp port. > > I'm not sure which is most likely. What do we do now? Contact Kaspersky > and ask them to fix their stuff? Or just directly warn users not to use > Freenet with Kaspersky? > > - Zero3 > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFLVG23x7AVSvyjsUARAjUzAKDM5/t9As54apLCZn5wpnKq8mvNlwCeJp7Y wjHYZba2lO6njpCW67YhJR8= =HuWW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
