On Sat, 22 May 2010 17:17:41 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Did you have any specific structural changes you were thinking of as > a first step?
Except moving the FNP code, the only structural change I can think of right now is moving the block transfer code, but as you mention, it should wait until after the packet format is done. I haven't looked closely at the crypto code yet, so I might need to do something there. > However, it will be necessary to keep support for old style bulk > transfers for quite some time because it is needed for Update Over > Mandatory to continue to work. Hopefully the bulk transfer code will only be needed if we use FNP, and as long as the new packet format isn't merged before moving bulk transfer I think it should work out. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100524/231d4ded/attachment.pgp>
