On Monday 31 May 2010 09:21:10 pm Matthew Toseland wrote: > > PRO: > Spreading stuff out would ensure that (more or less) all terms fall out at > the same rate, and would reduce the amount of rebalancing we have to do, > which should result in slightly fewer nodes being inserted on an update. >
Isn't it good if rarely used stuff falls out quicker than the stuff with high demand? I have no clue of how all the spider/library stuff works though, I guess this is a question for Evan :) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100531/61add55d/attachment.pgp>
