On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Juiceman <juiceman69 at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Matthew Toseland <
> toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote:
>
>> On Monday 18 October 2010 14:30:48 Christian Funder Sommerlund wrote:
>> > [From the minutes]
>> > toad_ and nextgens bring up problems with the current windows installer,
>> > and give a brief of its history.
>> >
>> > nextgens notes that the hardest part is to continuously maintain it, to
>> > ensure that it keeps working.
>> >
>> > toad_ points out that he needs to purchase copies of Windows for testing
>> > purposes.
>> >
>> > Various people discuss ways of implementing a windows installer,
>> > including MSI/NSIS and even using a VM.
>> >
>> > infinity0 notes that this doesn't solve the problem of needing a regular
>> > maintainer.
>> >
>> > p0s argues that the windows installer is an important component and
>> > therefore by default falls to toad_ if no other suitable person can be
>> > found.
>> >
>> > toad_ accepts this solution in the case where our current maintainer
>> > Zero3 doesn't show up in time for the next release.
>> >
>> > sanity offers to provide windows licenses.
>> >
>> > [My comments]
>> > I feel like I ought to comment on the above, being the one that made
>> > (and kind-of maintains) the thing :).
>> >
>> > I'm not sure if it was mentioned at the meeting, but I'd like to point
>> > out that the main issues throughout the years have been directly related
>> > to
>> >
>> > A) The custom user we used (was removed some time ago)
>> > B) The custom service we used (was removed in the latest alpha)
>> >
>> > (both of which I argued on getting rid of back when I originally built
>> > our new windows installer, several years ago, but was overruled :()
>> >
>> > As we now know, neither of the above is easy to do properly across the
>> > vast lanscape of Windows installations. A) isn't exactly good practice
>> > on Windows anyway, but B) ought to be doable. B) will work on pretty
>> > much any Windows machine out-of-the-box, but has showed to be impossibly
>> > hard to make work reliably on certain existing setups.
>> >
>> > I agree with nextgens that one of the main issues is maintenance. The
>> > first year or so after my initial version was easy enough for me to do
>> > alone, given my situation back then, but since I've started on my CS
>> > studies it has been increasingly difficult for me to find time for
>> > maintaining it. Another person or two would help a lot.
>> >
>> > Regarding choice of installer (custom AHK vs. NSIS vs. MSI vs...), I
>> > still believe that a custom installer is a huge bonus to usability. The
>> > downside, however, is that it requires more maintenance compared to a
>> > standardized wizard installer.
>>
>> Can you coordinate with Juiceman to get an update script sorted out for
>> the alpha? (If necessary in cmd script). Are there any other critical issues
>> that must be solved before deploying the alpha?
>>
>
> Ok, I have installed the alpha on a VM.  It looks like the start.exe and
> stop.exe are no longer used?  Also, the utilities wget.exe and sha1test.jar
> aren't installed.
>
> I need to know the command line arguments to start and stop the node and
> also if there are exit conditions (errorlevel 0, etc).
> We need to make sure wget.exe, sha1test.jar and startssl.pem are
> installed.  Also it needs to be decided where those files will be
> installed.  I'm not clear what we're doing with the folder restructuring...
>
> I had committed update.exe which was just a wrapper to call update.cmd;
> this was to prompt a UAC elevation (hopefully).  Do we want to use this or
> is it obsolete now?
>
> I can redo the update.cmd script if that is still the plan as long as the
> above items are taken care of.
>
>
Bump.  Any response?

-- 
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death,
your right to say it. - Voltaire
Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve
neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20101104/8492d0e2/attachment.html>

Reply via email to