On Friday 19. November 2010 22:04:25 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Ok. However IMHO packet numbers need to be per-key, and it is possible for > two keys to temporarily be live at once (at least it should be, > implementing it that way in old FNP fixed some largish issues).
Good point. 72768a0 is a quick fix, but it won't work if a tracker we've used before becomes the current tracker again. For example, if tracker A is the previous tracker, could it happen that A is promoted to the current tracker? It looks like it could happen in maybeSwapTrackers(), but both callers replace previousTracker first so it should be fine right? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20101121/8c2479ed/attachment.pgp>
