On Wednesday 19 Oct 2011 16:56:13 Robert Hailey wrote: > > I just thought of another prediction (or symptom) which indicate that > the current announcement scheme is toxic (shallow-first). > > I would postulate that many nodes (perhaps those not traffic- > saturated) would have to intermittently re-announce as they slowly > loose their connection to the network. A rolling effect by the 'good > routes' being replaced by bootstrapping nodes.
Something similar is reported anecdotally quite often. I had assumed it was simply due to the network dropping ineffective nodes. > > Do we have any data (or theories) or the expected (or actual) re- > connection rates? Get some. :) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20111105/38031f30/attachment.pgp>
