El 03/04/12 11:08, Matthew Toseland escribi?: > IMHO a lot of geeks still use perl, it makes some sense. Did you have a look > at the existing libraries? I think there is some perl stuff, I dunno if it's > actually used ...
Yeah, there are some libraries. There is Net::FCP [1], wich is ancient and works with Freenet 0.5, there is also AnyEvent::FCP [2] (Freenet 0.7), the one I mentioned in the previous email and what I found to be pretty messy and undocumented and there is the Net::FCP::Tiny [3], a very basic and tiny module, wich does pretty much nothing but to create a socket and send a message (~60 lines code). > One problem is the last time we had a student for a library, they > half-finished it and didn't document it, (and then had to withdraw for > personal reasons). Libraries need to be documented, and easy to use (include > a simple demo). I don't know whether we need it to be full-featured, as some > of the FCP functionality is fairly obscure. I understand. It is my main purpose to create a _well-documented_ and _easy-to-use_ library. That's why I refered to my previous Perl work, so you could see how is coded and documented. Anyway, I'll work in a simple demo to express what I have in mind and post it the next few days. Thank you for the feedback. References: [1] http://search.cpan.org/~mlehmann/Net-FCP-1.2/FCP.pm [2] http://search.cpan.org/~mlehmann/AnyEvent-FCP-0.3/FCP.pm [3] http://search.cpan.org/~avar/Net-FCP-Tiny-0.03/lib/Net/FCP/Tiny.pm Best Regards. -- Israel Leiva
