Hi! On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Nicolas Hernandez < nicolas.hernandez at aleph-networks.com> wrote:
> Hello, > *First of all*; > > - http://goo.gl/kOEAU > - http://goo.gl/QhPVD > > Are ok for me, the only reason i prefer going to gwt is the team. It is > easier to find dev using GWT than Wickets. > Wicket + Velocity is a excellent solution, if there is a team of minimum 5 > devs. We can help about these 2 projects (code review, architecture design, > and some devs later) > Great to hear! * > Concerning GWT*: > *If all devs and the leader of http://goo.gl/QhPVD are ok to use GWT *we > can consider rewriting FProxy using GWT components. > We can use GWT as a pool of components only. > -> Using Velocity for templating (if needed). > -> using jsp like pages > I'm not sure what you mean by "using JSP-like pages"? do you mean to imitate JSP-Behavior by utilizing Velocity? or to use VelocityStruts ( https://velocity.apache.org/tools/devel/struts/) to support JSP pages? -> developping gwt components simply embeded into jsp pages (qwt with dual > mode js/non-js) > Is there anyway to avoid JavaScript when using GWT? If I'm not mistaken, the GWT compiler (or better said: translator) compiles Java to JavaScript ( http://css.dzone.com/news/understanding-gwt-compiler). Are you going to another framework for non-JS support? > ps: jsp pages are a good solution for designers (as wickets) > In deed! However there was a discussion last year regarding using JSP ( http://www.mail-archive.com/devl at freenetproject.org/msg25805.html). Matthew was more or less against using JSP and Servlets, because of the extra features (and size!) which we don't need. That's why we moved to Velocity: simplicity, fast and small in size. > > > *Remember, we have solutions, but we are only followers. In all cases > FProxy rewriting needs an afficial and hitorical dev leader (like nextgen > :-) )* Indeed! > * > * > - Nicolas Hernandez > a-n - aleph-networks > *CEO* > http://www.aleph-networks.com > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Pouyan Zachar <pouyanster at gmail.com>wrote: > >> Dear Nicolas, >> >> as you may know, I have proposed to rewrite the Freenet GUI in context of >> GSoC 2012 (see http://goo.gl/kOEAU and http://goo.gl/QhPVD) In order to >> avoid duplicate implementations, I would really like to get more insight >> about your current approach and implementation using GWT. >> >> Regards >> Pouyan >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120412/b04a0e5f/attachment.html>
