On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 20:52 -0400, Steve Dougherty wrote: > On 07/05/2012 05:42 PM, Pouyan Zaxar wrote: > > * What are the options? ** Wicket Native websocket (doesnt have > > fallback support) ** Wicket atmosphere integration (has fallback > > modes but is not the latest version of atmosphere integrated) > > Are there significant disadvantages to how much the version of > Atmosphere is outdated? Is my impression correct that the version of > Atmosphere in Wicket has Websocket support but not have AJAX? Why do > you want to use AJAX and not some other transport? Is it possible to > upgrade the Atmosphere module Wicket uses manually? >
That should be possible. The maintainer is however not reachable atm and I would have to do it myself. The current version used by Wicket is 0.9.4 and the latest version is 1.0.0.beta2a. I'll see what I can do. Atmosphere in Wicket has AJAX support (fallback). But if I was to use the native library, then I should've implemented the fallback mode myself. > > ** if you think using atmosphere is better than native websocket > > implementation of wicket > > My impression is that working with an established framework like > Atmosphere could have less from-scratch work and need for low-level > polish than native websockets. Why are you leaning towards native > websockets? After playing with the SNAPSHOT version of native library, I discovered a lot of shortcomings. That's why I'd stay with atmosphere module! > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 490 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120707/827b1f70/attachment.pgp>
