-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/21/2012 01:01 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > This appears to be the same as the first one, which I have applied. > Is that correct?
It appears so: the RARs are identical. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJP42R4AAoJECLJP19KqmFuuZEP/1KWOC8Wf6dQhN4yJGvrcyZB 8jEh1XnAB7N+srWLDwrH9X62ZcBJ/UbzpBTfs3l1Hq00FSUkP6FV9pmPwz8frGtr aiiMkF8kJGyasDsFuIaAZ1/LRBAhi5cPDg/hiysPqI+aJztkGMSRmyKd8tS53w3Z U+VXNy85Hjd2SQPQuMUAe88ewKPQAOUPMQxcpBX1WG2kIRKY3TNTf2F5Q4x1KuXe OKfYRDFJRnEEAwtKd1UbGPS60bYCP8E1Z2xCLZJHMAWWq3gmXmTlsK23uEX6N4BS krZFAMMP2zK0Tm4pQckEAFlZxOfYHKLueadO1e+GqWSp5CArMpx4hhc0aiKDsvmW SkgoXGKRN44A14OGBkm+I1z7pOaj12cIna1xgHQ6TOZ8XviRnQty6bmD3SpOfyDy Za2OLcfWVbHO2G4E3GjgJvmtEmkYMOIaNWwM6DzVlczGXB2NZNjvcNPP+0jGp1cc UAIumgYOoxUtxmBoRHgk59rAi7yaIprwMPKa2wd5sKVa12lWCv4f9s6e81T1Hiw8 sQGTHRBNApy0p1/1ngD8WFwB8nSXkj2d9Z018JOpnwC69b4HRW8e+FXEvfvFJR1U gNrnHkMuV/gmxmTNKyX9uxdYImR/HyuAl7mKnPNpdksFK8Ey0YXbceCabP4XMGij Rb9xjRr46efwipfPOqdd =rK4U -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
