>  But gitlab escalated "confirmations" of my identity beyond all
acceptable limits.

Could you explain exactly what problem you're facing, perhaps with some
video of what you're running into? Have you checked your email's spam
folder?

If you have disabled cookies for gitlab, then it won't keep you logged in.
That's the case with the vast majority of websites that have logins. The
old days of having a session ID in the URL are over, since it makes for
easy leaks of session cookies via URL sharing.

I have just tried registering several additional accounts with gitlab, then
removed them, and it worked as expected.

Does your email domain have DMARC and SPF set up? Does the email server
accept connections via TLS (SMTPS)? Those would be the top problems I think.

Cheers, Kuba


On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 9:27 AM Rafał Pietrak <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I'd like to get there, I tried. But gitlab escalated "confirmations" of
> my identity beyond all acceptable limits. I'm not going to waste more of
> my time for that.
>
> So this is not my choice anymore. Irrespective of "benefits" I will not
> get dragged into organizations I despise. In this case it's the gitlab.
>
> -R
>
> On 16.06.2025 23:21, 'Seth Hillbrand' via KiCad Developers wrote:
> > Thanks but without a GitLab report we will be unable to address this.
> > Please consider that if everyone submitted an issue this way, the team
> > would be unable to handle any of them.
> >
> > You may find end users willing to help you with understanding how to use
> > multi channel tool better at the forum (https://forum.kicad.info
> > <https://forum.kicad.info>) if you do not wish to register with GitLab.
> >
> > Seth
> >
> > KiCad Services Corporation Logo
> > Seth Hillbrand
> > *Lead Developer*
> > +1-530-302-5483‬
> > Long Beach, CA
> > www.kipro-pcb.com <https://www.kipro-pcb.com/> [email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 2:01 PM Rafał Pietrak <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi,
> >
> >     https://www.electric-
> >     sheep.eu/0WPPnXhN8uAVGNnNzGBaIISw6z7U84p7srSE411BTQ.mkv <https://
> >     www.electric-sheep.eu/0WPPnXhN8uAVGNnNzGBaIISw6z7U84p7srSE411BTQ.mkv
> >.
> >     It's 16MB and I'll leave it there for a couple of days. Regrettably
> >     gitlab refused my registration, so I cannot use proper channel to
> hand
> >     it over to you. I don't mind handing over the project files, too.
> Just
> >     tell me it'll help.
> >
> >     no audio there, so pls follow the mouse moves.
> >
> >     I didn't mean "exclude from multi=channel", quite the opposite. My
> >     intention was to suggest "here multi-channel starts" marker at
> >     schematic/sub-schematic level. This comes from the fact, that
> currently
> >     implemented generation of zones based on sub-schematic creates areas,
> >     which reflect "currently" (that is "random") placement of components
> -
> >     because it's done before placement replication action. So in my work
> I
> >     had to re-generate zones after every attempt to replicate their
> >     configuration. Having a single flag at schematic level fixes that.
> >
> >     -R
> >
> >     On 16.06.2025 19:22, 'Seth Hillbrand' via KiCad Developers wrote:
> >      > Hi Rafał,
> >      >
> >      > If there is a case where sub sheets can't find their matches in
> the
> >      > multichannel tool, this sounds like it might be a bug.  Can you
> >     post a
> >      > minimal example to a bug report?
> >      >
> >      > It is not quite clear to me what additional benefit comes from
> >      > specialized markers for 'exclude from multi-channel'.  When
> >     creating the
> >      > multi-channel design, you can already pick and choose which rules
> >     areas
> >      > and/or subsheets are included.  However, if you could post a
> >     video of
> >      > your process along with what you are trying to achieve to the bug
> >      > tracker, this would be helpful in either fixing the tool or
> >     fixing the
> >      > documentation
> >      >
> >      > Seth
> >      >
> >      > KiCad Services Corporation Logo
> >      > Seth Hillbrand
> >      > *Lead Developer*
> >      > +1-530-302-5483‬
> >      > Long Beach, CA
> >      > www.kipro-pcb.com <http://www.kipro-pcb.com> <https://www.kipro-
> >     pcb.com/ <https://www.kipro-pcb.com/>> [email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>
> >      > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >
> >      > On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 10:40 PM Rafał Pietrak <solver@electric-
> >     sheep.eu <mailto:[email protected]>
> >      > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:solver@electric-
> >     sheep.eu>>> wrote:
> >      >
> >      >     Hi all,
> >      >
> >      >     For some time now I'm using-and-testing the multichannel
> >     tool. During
> >      >     that time I've stumbled upon cases where zone mapping of
> >     identical
> >      >     copied of sub-schematics fail to find isomorphism complaining
> of
> >      >     "topological missmatch". But those sub-shcematics ARE
> identical.
> >      >
> >      >     So I was wondering, it it would be prudent and along the
> >     design roadmap
> >      >     if the "rules zones" based on subschematics were indicated as
> >     sub-sheet
> >      >     marker/flag available just like "exclude from simulation" or
> >     "exclude
> >      >     from board" are. An additional flag would be something like:
> "pin
> >      >     rule-zone to schematic" (or "schematic also defines role
> >     zone") and
> >      >     replace the "generate rule zone" step of defining area to
> >     replicate.
> >      >     Currently this becomes possible, as an option to indicate one
> >     part
> >      >     withing sub-sheet, that will "govern the placement and
> >     orientation" of
> >      >     replicated zones.
> >      >
> >      >     I still haven't worked out how exactly and where in the kicad
> >     code the
> >      >     "Generate zone" maps the identity of parts involved in the
> >     bug/failure
> >      >     resulting in topological mismatches I've experienced during
> >      >     replication.
> >      >     I'd appreciate a helping hand in understanding the code.
> >      >
> >      >     Regards,
> >      >
> >      >     -R
> >      >
> >      >     --
> >      >     You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> >     Google
> >      >     Groups "KiCad Developers" group.
> >      >     To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
> it,
> >      >     send an email to [email protected]
> >     <mailto:devlist%[email protected]>
> >      >     <mailto:devlist%[email protected]
> >     <mailto:devlist%[email protected]>>.
> >      >     To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/
> >     kicad.org/ <https://groups.google.com/a/kicad.org/>
> >      >
>  d/msgid/devlist/b78ce4e8-6f6a-419a-bcde-948fc9f6ed6b%40electric-
> >      > sheep.eu <http://sheep.eu> <https://groups.google.com/a/
> >     kicad.org/d/msgid/devlist/ <https://groups.google.com/a/kicad.org/d/
> >     msgid/devlist/>
> >      >     b78ce4e8-6f6a-419a-bcde-948fc9f6ed6b%40electric-sheep.eu
> >     <http://40electric-sheep.eu>>.
> >      >
> >      > --
> >      > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >      > Groups "KiCad Developers" group.
> >      > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> >     send
> >      > an email to [email protected]
> >     <mailto:devlist%[email protected]>
> >      > <mailto:[email protected]
> >     <mailto:devlist%[email protected]>>.
> >      > To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/
> >     kicad.org/d/ <https://groups.google.com/a/kicad.org/d/>
> >      > msgid/devlist/CAFdeG-osU9g9xNdF8Eqjb-gP-
> >      > xDDGSbfWsBYUcnTj82BV5AugA%40mail.gmail.com
> >     <http://40mail.gmail.com> <https://groups.google.com/a/ <https://
> >     groups.google.com/a/>
> >      > kicad.org/d/msgid/devlist/CAFdeG-osU9g9xNdF8Eqjb-gP- <http://
> >     kicad.org/d/msgid/devlist/CAFdeG-osU9g9xNdF8Eqjb-gP->
> >      > xDDGSbfWsBYUcnTj82BV5AugA%40mail.gmail.com
> >     <http://40mail.gmail.com>?
> >      > utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
> >
> >     --
> >     You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >     Groups "KiCad Developers" group.
> >     To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> >     send an email to [email protected]
> >     <mailto:devlist%[email protected]>.
> >     To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/kicad.org/
> >     d/msgid/devlist/931a9545-bdca-4c3c-bfb3-d67ad1d84b70%40electric-
> >     sheep.eu <https://groups.google.com/a/kicad.org/d/msgid/
> >     devlist/931a9545-bdca-4c3c-bfb3-d67ad1d84b70%40electric-sheep.eu>.
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "KiCad Developers" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> > an email to [email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>.
> > To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/kicad.org/d/
> > msgid/devlist/CAFdeG-
> > odPUoQgkgPtshRVe_J1h49msuiV5TEOrrizS9mSfFBig%40mail.gmail.com <https://
> > groups.google.com/a/kicad.org/d/msgid/devlist/CAFdeG-
> > odPUoQgkgPtshRVe_J1h49msuiV5TEOrrizS9mSfFBig%40mail.gmail.com?
> > utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "KiCad Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/kicad.org/d/msgid/devlist/5bef921d-9ac8-4a71-8324-73daf22f2368%40electric-sheep.eu
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"KiCad Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/kicad.org/d/msgid/devlist/CAG4N6cq_YLS0h14okDU0NHUy2Trf-SXB81tNSzJS7x%3D9cW9mew%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to