@zhreshold Thanks for the feedback, I use the pre-trained ResNet-50 model and
validation-set of ImageNet-1k, and the accuracy with/w.o my changes are same:
see test result:
**Without** my changes:
INFO:root:Finished with 126.286497 images per second
INFO:root:('accuracy', 0.753156969309463)
INFO:root:('top_k_accuracy_5', 0.9257512787723785)
**With** my changes:
INFO:root:Finished with 126.029153 images per second
INFO:root:('accuracy', 0.753156969309463)
INFO:root:('top_k_accuracy_5', 0.9257512787723785)
The imagenet validation perf and accuracy are **same**.
But without my changes, the validation accuracy trends of
CIFAR10+ResNet50/VGG16 are as below, obviously it is not expected.


[ Full content available at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12362 ]
This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for [email protected]