On Jun 12, 2008, at 1:53 AM, sdumitriu (SVN) wrote:
> Author: sdumitriu
> Date: 2008-06-12 01:53:06 +0200 (Thu, 12 Jun 2008)
> New Revision: 10270
>
> Modified:
> xwiki-products/xwiki-enterprise/trunk/distribution-test/selenium-
> tests/src/test/it/com/xpn/xwiki/it/selenium/WikiEditorTest.java
> Log:
> [misc] Added a comment
>
>
> Modified: xwiki-products/xwiki-enterprise/trunk/distribution-test/
> selenium-tests/src/test/it/com/xpn/xwiki/it/selenium/
> WikiEditorTest.java
> ===================================================================
> --- xwiki-products/xwiki-enterprise/trunk/distribution-test/selenium-
> tests/src/test/it/com/xpn/xwiki/it/selenium/WikiEditorTest.java
> 2008-06-11 23:51:17 UTC (rev 10269)
> +++ xwiki-products/xwiki-enterprise/trunk/distribution-test/selenium-
> tests/src/test/it/com/xpn/xwiki/it/selenium/WikiEditorTest.java
> 2008-06-11 23:53:06 UTC (rev 10270)
> @@ -159,6 +159,9 @@
> // TODO: We need to find out how to make a text selection in
> Selenium
> }
>
> + /**
> + * See XWIKI-1007
> + */
Personally I don't like referring to JIRA issues like this because:
1) the reader has to navigate to the issue to understand what it is
2) there's the risk that in the future we'll use a tool other than jira
So I'd prefer you simply say: "Verify that a document's content can be
empty" or if you prefer " Verify that a document's content can be
empty (see XWIKI-2007).". My preference for the former.
BTW naming the test: testEmptyDocumentContentIsAllowed would be even
better :)
Thanks
-Vincent
> public void testEmptyContent()
> {
> open("/xwiki/bin/edit/Test/EmptyWikiContent?editor=wiki");
>
> _______________________________________________
> notifications mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/notifications
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
