Hi Paul, Paul Libbrecht wrote: > Marius, > > are you anyways depending on rocket-gwt?
No. I was considering using it for its Selection support, but I discovered this support is limited for what I need. > Although we were enthusiastic about it for "skills-text-box", I am about > to give it up. > Rocket is mostly the work of one person and some of its features such as > the stacktrace compilation warning kept byting my IDEA away from it, > till impossibility of building. > > Rocket is still in 0.x which has made it that the component we use was > actually dropped between 0.4 and 0.5.2... something quite annoying... > > So if you have the choice, just be warned. Thanks for the tip. > > paul > > PS: isn't w3c range a super modern specification? I think saw trafic > about it on the public-webapp w3c mailing-list recently. This would > explain why it is not implemented everywhere. Actually Mozilla follows pretty close the W3C Range specification http://developer.mozilla.org/en/DOM/range . Other important browsers are trying to do the same http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/range_intro.html . Internet Explorer, of course, doesn't care about specifications. Best regards, Marius > > On 17-oct.-08, at 11:20, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote: > >> ** The selection support from rocket-gwt library is very limited right >> now which makes it unusable for WYSIWYG editing (see >> http://tinyurl.com/5pvul5 ). > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
