No -1 until now.

Ludovic Dubost wrote:
> Any -1 votes ? Or should we proceed on setting up our own l10n.xwiki.org 
> tool ?
> 
> Ludovic
> 
> Ludovic Dubost wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think we need to move forward and get to a decision on our approach.
>>
>> I've currently not been very convinced on the launchpad approach given 
>> that it seems overly complex to get our translations loaded in their 
>> system. The french translations I've been trying to load are blocked for 
>> review (see https://translations.launchpad.net/xwiki/+imports ). Also I 
>> don't see clearly where to get the source code for launchpad to have our 
>> own install if we wanted, and how complex it would be given that 
>> launchpad has many other features unrelated to translations.
>>
>> On the other hand, I've improved the speed of the translation app on 
>> http://l10n.myxwiki.org using counting caches and it seems to work quite 
>> well.
>>
>> So I would like to launch a vote to go with the XWiki translation 
>> application approach and move it to it's own wiki on l10n.xwiki.org. We 
>> also need this wiki to be UTF-8 in order to support translations in all 
>> languages.
>>
>> Here is my +1 for using l10n.myxwiki.org
>>
>> Ludovic
>>
>> Ludovic Dubost wrote:
>>   
>>> Hi team,
>>>
>>> I wrore a report about the different localization strategies we could 
>>> have for XWiki comparing:
>>>
>>> - a simple tool Jean-Vincent wrote
>>> - an L10N app I started to build
>>> - using launchpad.net
>>>
>>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/Selecting+a+tool+for+managing+Localization
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>> Please review and add requirements if you see requirements that have 
>>> not been listed. I think we need to look at the applications and 
>>> evaluate them in more details, especially to see of launchpad.net 
>>> could work for us.
>>>
>>> Let's discuss.
>>>
>>> Ludovic
>>>


-- 
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to