Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> Note that I don't know what are the REST best practices. I'm jut
> noticing the inconsistency.
>
Ok. I saw what you meant.
I modified a bit the resources to remove the inconsistency.
I did this because attachments have also their own versioning.
So you can access a specific version of an attachment either by
requesting an attachment at a given page version
or by requesting an specific version of an attachment.
To be consistent I only left the resources for referring to an
attachment starting for a given page version:
/space/{space}/pages/{page}/attachments
/space/{space}/pages/{page}/attachments/{attachment}
/space/{space}/pages/{page}/{version}/attachments/
/space/{space}/pages/{page}/{version}/attachments/{attachment}
I still maintained the non-verbose version but that can be changed if
there is not an agreement on it.
However it might be still useful to expose attachment resources by using
their own versioning:
/space/{space}/pages/{page}/attachments/{attachment}/history
/space/{space}/pages/{page}/attachments/{attachment}/{version}
Thanks.
-Fabio
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
