On Jun 29, 2009, at 10:28 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote: > > > Vincent Massol wrote: >> On Jun 29, 2009, at 4:05 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: >> >>> Hi devs, >>> >>> We need to decide something for http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3413 >>> >>> I propose to take Vincent's proposal and have a parameter >>> "outputType" >>> in the URL which provide the syntax identifier of the renderer to >>> use. >>> >>> Also since syntax identifier contains "/" which i never remember the >>> escaped version when i need it i propose to support short names by >>> looking at available renderers and take the last version of the >>> asked >>> syntax (which mean the only renderer of this syntax most of the time >>> anyway but I prefer having something in case of). >>> >>> So for example you could ask for the page Space.Page printed as >>> plain >>> text and without UI with the URL: >>> >>> http://host/xwiki/bin/view/Space/Page?outputType=plain&xpage=plain >>> >>> or the full form >>> >>> http://host/xwiki/bin/view/Space/Page?outputType=plain%2F1.0&xpage=plain >>> >>> I don't like xpage=plain but it already exists and is doing exactly >>> this, printing the content of the document without UI. We can decide >>> latter if we want a new parameter for this. >>> >>> Feel free to propose another name, I'm not sure of "outputType" >>> but i >>> could not find a better one and "renderer" seems too technical. >> >> +1 for short name. We could also have an optional outputVersion >> rather >> than the full name with the "/". I'd prefer this it separates more >> clearly the namespaces and there's no need for special parsing (it >> would work with a syntax which has a "/" in its name for example). > > Why not simply "syntax" instead of "outputType"? "type" is too generic > IMO. "syntax" is more like "language" but for applications. I have a > resource (Space.Page) and I'd like to access a representation of this > resource in a specific syntax known by my client application: > Space/Page?syntax=pdf
I like "syntax" even though we don't know what syntax we're talking about. +1 from me for either outputSyntax (removes the ambiguity) or simply syntax (keeps the ambiguity but maybe ok). > I agree with Vincent that a separate, optional, parameter for the > syntax > version is better. I'd then propose syntaxVersion (if we use syntax) or outputSyntaxVersion (if we use outputSyntax) since version alone is probably not specific enough and could be used for other things in other contexts. Thanks -Vincent > >> >> +1 in general. > > +1 in general too. > > Thanks, > Marius > >> >> Thanks >> -Vincent >> >>> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 13:15, Vincent Massol<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> On May 4, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Thomas Mortagne >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Hi devs, >>>>>> >>>>>> In 2.0 architecture we have no way currently to print a strongly >>>>>> formatted text (like JSON) or simply a plain text without XHTML >>>>>> which >>>>>> we are doing generally using xpage=plain in XWiki 1.0 >>>>> With the 1.0 syntax xpage=plain was mainly used to: >>>>> 1/ Output data in special format (JSON, xls, etc). In those cases >>>>> {pre} was used to avoid xhtml transformations. >>>>> 2/ Output xhtml content without the XWiki UI, I can think of one >>>>> use >>>>> case where this content was put in ajax tooltips. >>>>> >>>>> Is 2/ covered ? Do we need a xpage=xhtml for it ? >>>>> Note that xpage=xpart&vm=contentview.vm can be used as a >>>>> workaround. >>>> If you we want to have something clean for the future it seems to >>>> me >>>> that having a parameter called outputType (or simply output, or >>>> type, >>>> or contentType) which can take all renderer values would be best. >>>> >>>> For ex outputType=xhtml, xwiki, text, pdf, rtf, etc >>>> >>>> And when not specified it would default to outputType=xhtml. >>>> >>>> For removing the UI I'd use another parameter since it's >>>> orthogonal. >>>> Something like showUI=true|false >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
