On Nov 15, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > On 11/15/2010 11:06 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: >> >> On Nov 15, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: >> >>> On 11/15/2010 09:35 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: >>>> Hi devs, >>>> >>>> Now that we've agreed to have major release cycles we need to define what >>>> we do for the current cycle >>>> (see >>>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/DevelopmentPractices#HReleaseCyclesandReleaseStrategy). >>>> >>>> I'm proposing here to make XE 2.7 the last minor release of the 2.x cycle. >>>> >>>> Here's my +1 >>> >>> 0. I can't decide before I know what the quality is going to be. >> >> Does it mean you don't agree with the voted Release Cycle strategy since >> it's time-based an not "quality"-based? > > No, it means that the strategy does allow for one or more extra releases > if the cycle is not stable enough. Let's say that I'm +1 for *trying* to > make 2.7 the last release, but until we release it, we can't know if > we'll find ten major bugs that we can't fix in the allocated one month > period. One such example is the fact that the new recent activity > implementation doesn't work in virtual wikis. Do you prefer to release a > broken 2.7 and leave it like that?
Sergiu please read what I said below. Let me repeat it: * I'm talking about the last **Minor** release not the last **bugfix** release Thanks -Vincent > >> Also if by "quality" you mean bugs then 2.7 will not be the last bug fix >> release of the 2.x cycle; it would be the last minor release only. >> >> Thanks >> -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
