+1 Thanks, Thibaut
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea < [email protected]> wrote: > On 02/11/2011 10:33 AM, Denis Gervalle wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:17, Vincent Massol<[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> Thanks for your feedback on my previous mail on this topic. I've > discussed > >> it more with Gregory and Emilie and here's what we'd like to propose > now: > >> > >> * Add a Profesional Services heading on the download which would contain > >> ** Some text explaining about community support and linking to > >> http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Support (which already > describes > >> community support) > >> ** A livetable containing companies offering professional services for > >> XWiki. The columns would be: > >> *** Logo > >> *** Company name > >> *** Number of active committers > >> *** Link to the correct anchor on the Support page ( > >> http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Support) > >> ** The livetable would only show 3 entries > >> ** The livetable would be sorted by active committers by default > >> ** A text that explains how to add a new company to the list and which > >> would point to the Governance page ( > >> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Governance) > >> > >> * We will remove the current XWiki SAS support link since that > information > >> will be moved to the livetable > >> > >> * Rework the download page so that when a download link is clicked, it > >> opens a new page containing the feedback questionnaire while the > download > >> happens > >> ** Note that for this to be technically possible I propose to remove the > >> link to the OW2 mirrors and instead link to the only existing mirror > (OW2 > >> seems to have only 1...). If not, we would need some code to compute > which > >> OW2 mirror to use based on the location. > >> > >> * The feedback questionnaire page would contain the following: > >> ** The following questionnaire: > >> > http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/SatisfactionSurveyProducts(let'stune > the questions together) > >> ** The questionnaire would start with a first question asking to which > >> companies it should be sent to. We would list all companies offering > >> professional support (using checkboxes) with a special text for the top > one > >> ("Top contributor") and in parenthesis listing the number of active > >> committers. For example: > >> > >> [ ] XWiki SAS - Top contributor with 15 active committers > >> [ ] Softec - 1 active committer > >> > >> ** A text explaining that it's optional and what the questionnaire will > be > >> used for, i.e. that > >> *** it will be published anonymously on xwiki.org to improve the > product > >> *** it will be sent to the companies for which the user has checked the > box > >> > >> > >> We've tried to design this proposal with taking 2 ideas into account: > >> 1) that it's fair and that all companies can have a fair visibility > >> 2) that it's visible which companies contribute the most (to reward > their > >> contributions) > >> > >> WDYT? > >> > > > > That seems to me really fair, and you have my big +1 ! > > Thanks, > > +1 too. > > Thanks, > Marius > > > > > Denis > > > > > >> > >> Thanks > >> -Vincent > >> > >> On Jan 10, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: > >> > >>> Hi devs and everyone, > >>> > >>> Emilie has proposed the following content to be added to the Download > >> page (http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download): > >>> > >>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/TextDownload > >>> > >>> The idea is twofold: > >>> 1) to get feedback about what people think about our software. > >>> 2) some people who download the XWiki software from xwiki.org don't > know > >> that XWiki SAS has a commercial offerings and could be interested by it > >>> > >>> The pros for the community are: > >>> 1) XWiki SAS will publish back the result of the feedback it receives > >> from the download form which will allow us to fine tune and improve the > >> software > >>> 2) XWiki SAS could get more business (from people who want to buy > >> support, dev work, hosting, etc) which will mean accrued budget for > paying > >> developers and resources to work on the XWiki project > >>> > >>> Note 1: the form would be of course optional > >>> Note 2: in the future I'd like to see a not for profit foundation to > >> handle xwiki.org, the xwiki open source project, donations, etc. When > this > >> happens we could elect from member for the foundation and have the > feedback > >> form sent to that foundation for example, with members of the foundation > >> having access to the data (for example). > >>> > >>> WDYT? > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> -Vincent Massol, acting as both CTO of XWiki SAS and XWiki open source > >> developer > >>> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> devs mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > >> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
