On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 4, 2011, at 8:37 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: > >> Hi devs, >> >> I've started creating the top level commons project and I started moving the >> top level pom module in there. >> However that modules requires 2 build tools: license (adds copyright license >> info to jars) and verifications (checkstyle). >> >> We need to decide where we put these 2 build tools. >> >> I can think of 3 solutions: >> >> Solution 1 >> ======== >> * Create a top level tools project in which each tool is released separately >> (and thus have a separate jira project) >> >> Solution 2 >> ======== >> * Put them in commons/trunk/xwiki-common-tools/ >> * Use the same JIRA project for everything in commons/ (ie same release >> cycles) >> * Note: we'll have a JIRA component for each module in commons/ >> >> Solution 3 >> ======== >> * Have commons/xwiki-common-tools/trunk(branches/tags) and >> commons/xwiki-common-modules/trunk(branches/tags) >> * Use 1 JIRA for commons/xwiki-common-modules/ and one JIRA per tool in >> commons/xwiki-common-tools/ >> * Don't provide a commons/pom.xml file (since otherwise it would be >> unversionned) >> * Note: for artifactIds I'd suggest to not show the "modules" part in the >> name, i.e. xwiki-commons--component-api, and not >> xwiki-commons-module-component-api > > hmmm we have the same need for the top level pom actually if we want to > version it. > > So the best seems to be solution 3 with: > > commons/ > |_ xwiki-commons-pom > |_ tags > |_ branches > |_ trunk > |_ xwiki-commons-tools > |_ tags > |_ branches > |_ trunk > |_ xwiki-common-modules > |_ tags > |_ branches > |_ trunk > > with 4 JIRA projects: > - 1 for xwiki-common-modules XCMODULES > - 1 for xwiki-common-pom XCPOM > - 1 for xwiki-common-tools/xwiki-common-tool-license XCLICENSE > - 1 for xwiki-common-tools/xwiki-common-tool-verifications XCVERIFICATIONS > > WDYT?
+0 for this solution. I don't understand why tools get indivudual JIRA modules while modules don't, though. IMHO it should be one project XCTOOLS with 2 components, to be consistent with modules. Jerome. > > Thanks > -Vincent > >> >> I'm hesitating between solutions 2 and 3. >> >> Solution 2 is the simplest of all. It just means all common is released >> together. >> >> WDYT? >> >> If you don't have any idea I'll just pick the one I think is best. We need >> to progress since the release is for Monday. >> >> Thanks >> -Vincent >> > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
