Ok it's clearer now thanks :)
2012/5/29 Vincent Massol <[email protected]>: > > On May 29, 2012, at 5:46 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > >> On Tuesday, May 29, 2012, Jeremie BOUSQUET <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Well, I have no problem to use "org.xwiki.contrib" for groupId (though >>> I personnally don't like to put unrelated projects at same level in >>> repositories), > > Yes and thanks Sergiu for correcting me. I wasn't thinking straight when I > first replied to Jeremie. > >>> but I don't really understand the motivation to use >>> org.xwiki.contrib.mailarchive for the java package ... >>> Well I understand it, but as I started this as a component, I used the >>> usual packages for components, ie "org.xwiki.component.mailarchive". >>> Should I really refactor my code to use "contrib" instead of >>> "component" ? > > Yes. > > org.xwiki.* is reserved for the XWiki Dev team except for org.xwiki.contrib.* > which is reserved for contrib projects. > > Also your code is not related to the component module (org.xwiki.component is > reserved for the Component module) so it wouldn't make much sense to use > org.xwiki.component. > >>> Do you mean that if a component makes it way from >>> contrib to xwiki core, you change the java package naming ? > > Yes, that's the current strategy. With modern IDEs, renaming is quite fast. > > Note that the target package (if moved in platform) would be > org.xwiki.mailarchive (if we agree about the "mailarchive" module name). > >>> I'm a bit >>> surprised but I'll do as you defined of course. >> >> Hmm... Vincent, WDYT? > > Thanks > -Vincent > >>> 2012/5/29 Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]>: >>>> On 05/29/2012 04:07 AM, Jeremie BOUSQUET wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Dear community, >>>>> >>>>> I would like to request for a new contrib project to store the Mail >>>>> Archive application I'm currently writing. >>>>> >>>>> Name: xwiki-application-mailarchive >>>>> Description: A mailing-list archive application. >>>>> >>>>> - For now a GitHub project to store sources should be fine. My >>>>> username on GitHub is "jbousque". >>>>> - For Jira it might be useful to have a project once the application >>>>> is released "officially", that is still not the case. Meanwhile the >>>>> generic project is ok for me. >>>>> - There is a specific page in Design space on xwiki.org : >>>>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/MailArchiveApplication , >>>>> but for now no extension has been added. I would like if possible to >>>>> test my extension (automatic install with dependencies) before >>>>> publishing it >>>>> >>>>> The Design page also gives some info about the current state and >>>>> progress, and some screenshots. There is many remaining work, but it >>>>> begins to look like something usable. The bad side is the lack of unit >>>>> tests most of all ... >>>>> >>>>> A question : the groupId "org.xwiki.contrib" is to be used, do I have >>>>> to use this exact groupId or can there be sublevels if needed ? >>>>> If so I would use org.xwiki.contrib.mailarchive as groupId. >>>> >>>> >>>> The groupId should be org.xwiki.contrib, but "groupId" means the groupId >>>> part of the maven artifact identity. >>>> >>>> However, the java package name *should* be org.xwiki.contrib.mailarchive >>>> -- >>>> Sergiu Dumitriu >>>> http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
