Hmmm. Frankly I see the two approaches as mutually exclusive.
If you import projects using m2e and it works, it doesn't make sense
to use the other approach because you will already have all that is
provided by the other one (and even more)

You are able to browse the the entire code base with both of the
approaches (just import anything you need, and if you don't use
snapshots m2e will download source code artifacts automatically and
show you the code for the dependencies if you don't have it available)

I still think that the M2E + wiki-debug-eclipse is a superior approach
(when it works fine :))

-Fabio

P.S.: Re another mail you sent, I usually deploy on tomcat with
xwiki-debug-eclipse (and lately also on jetty). Works out-of-the-box,
just define a profile and go.

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Gary Kopp <[email protected]> wrote:
> Fabio,
>
> Thanks for adding your two cents. I had seen Thomas' doc on debugging under
> Eclipse and it attracted me. Now I'm thinking I need to combine your/Thomas
> approach, using m2eclipse, with Sergiu's approach of using Maven's
> eclipse:eclipse without m2eclipse. Then I can go in any direction -- browse
> the entire codebase following all references _or_ debug one or more specific
> modules. All I really have to do to make this practical is maintain two
> separate clones of the Git code base (since they will have different Eclipse
> project metadata created within them).
>
> --Gary
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Fabio Mancinelli
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 6:03 AM
> To: XWiki Developers
> Subject: Re: [xwiki-devs] m2eclipse and xwiki-commons
>
> I personally use the great
> https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-debug-eclipse done by Thomas.
>
> I import this project and (modulo some initial glitches) I am able to start
> a working instance of XWiki from within the Workbench.
>
> Then I import the modules I want to work on from xwiki-platform.
> M2Eclipse takes care of using the modules open in the workbench in the XWiki
> web application.
> So I don't need to do any jar copying or whatever. Sometimes hot code
> replacement is also applicable so you don't even have to restart the
> instance when you modify stuff.
>
> Debugging works out-of-the-box.
>
> I think that this is a very nice environment where you can manage
> building/deploying/running XWiki from a single environment, with M2Eclipse
> and Eclipse WTP taking care automatically of many details (almost everything
> actually).
>
> My 2 cents.
>
> -Fabio
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:26 AM, Gary Kopp <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hello devs,
>>
>> I just finished porting my XWiki development environment from Windows
>> 7 to Ubuntu 12.04. I am now able to build all projects from the
>> command line without errors. I'm working with the master branch from
>> Git. I have Eclipse Juno installed with plugins that include m2eclipse
>> (the version from the Eclipse update site) and AJDT. I am now trying
>> to import the entire xwiki-commons Maven project into Eclipse. Just as
>> happened under Windows (which I never asked about, since I was still
>> trying to get command line builds to work), there are three Maven
>> goals (plugins) in the xwiki-commons projects that fail to map to
>> Eclipse plugins -- aspectJ-maven-plugin, maven-antrun-plugin, and
>> maven-remote-resources-plugin. Can anyone give me some hints on how to
>> resolve these mapping problems? Googling for answers about this hasn't
>> yielded anything that I can understand :-)
>>
>> --Gary
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devs mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to