I guess I have to create an extension page for each artifact ? (mail
extension, mailarchive api extension, mail archive ui extension)
Didn't had time to test within extension repository manager locally,
so I hope it'll work ! :)

2012/9/13 Vincent Massol <[email protected]>:
> I guess the next step is to create the extension page on e.x.o.
>
> That'll be awesome and I'll start testing it when it's there! :)
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> On Sep 13, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Jeremie BOUSQUET <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks !
>> No problem ...
>>
>> 2012/9/13 Vincent Massol <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>> On Sep 13, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Jeremie BOUSQUET <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> 2012/9/2 Jeremie BOUSQUET <[email protected]>:
>>>>>> I could successfully deploy mail archive artifacts to nexus staging !
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would someone kindly promote it ? :)
>>>>
>>>> Hi, just to recall that to you ... :)
>>>> (I know, seems a bit of a rush on 4.2 cycle and there is no urgency on
>>>> my side, just want to avoid moving too deep in the mailing-list)
>>>
>>> Done! Sorry for the lag…
>>>
>>> -Vincent
>>>>
>>>> 2012/9/2 Jeremie BOUSQUET <[email protected]>:
>>>>> (groupId : org.xwiki.contrib.mailarchive, version : 0.1, artifacts
>>>>> xwiki-contrib-mail, xwiki-contrib-mailarchive-api,
>>>>> xwiki-contrib-mailarchive-ui)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jeremie
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Jeremie
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2012/9/1 Jeremie BOUSQUET <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>> Wow, eventually, it worked ... Had to switch to using
>>>>>>> maven-release-plugin last version (2.3.2) instead of the one from
>>>>>>> xwiki.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now I'm ... back to the initial issue with the enforcer :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   [WARNING] Rule 0:
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.EvaluateBeanshell failed with
>>>>>>> message:
>>>>>>>   Couldn't evaluate condition: ("pom" != "jar") || ("pom" == "jar"
>>>>>>> && new 
>>>>>>> java.io.File("C:\PRIVATE\Dropbox\MAILARCHIVE\target\checkout\target/xwiki-contrib-mailarchive-0.1-javado
>>>>>>> c.jar").exists())
>>>>>>>   [INFO] 
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Grrrr !
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2012/9/1 Jeremie BOUSQUET <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>> I eventually was able to use push to git from maven with release
>>>>>>>> plugin (had to reinstall git with more preservative options).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But previous issue is still there: when checking-out my tag from local
>>>>>>>> clone in target/checkout, pom.xml files are not there so there's
>>>>>>>> nothing to build for maven ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2012/9/1 Jeremie BOUSQUET <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>> Progressing but still failing ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ... it's like a nightmare.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I gave up pushing to github from maven, I think there's something
>>>>>>>>> wrong with windows/mysysgit/cygwin somehow.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Now trying to release tag "xwiki-contrib-mailarchive-0.1":
>>>>>>>>> - it's pushed on github
>>>>>>>>> - if I download the related zip (in "tag" tab on github), it's 
>>>>>>>>> complete
>>>>>>>>> - if I "release:perform" from maven, target/checkout folder contains
>>>>>>>>> everything except pom.xml files ... of course release fails
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How can my pom.xml files be deleted when running "git checkout
>>>>>>>>> xwiki-contrib-mailarchive-0.1", while I can see them in my local
>>>>>>>>> history and on github ???
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2012/8/31 Jeremie BOUSQUET <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>> I tried both, but not tried exhaustively possible combinations
>>>>>>>>>> (ssh/https, maven/git conf, and my network proxy that comes in the 
>>>>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>>>> ...)
>>>>>>>>>> BTW I'm not sure about how credentials for github should be fed to
>>>>>>>>>> maven depending on SSH/HTTPS url connection used.
>>>>>>>>>> Authentication with keys works from git command-line to push to
>>>>>>>>>> github, but I think I miss some configuration maven-side.
>>>>>>>>>> Actually from maven "git push" time-outs, or freezes forever,
>>>>>>>>>> depending on protocol used.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2012/8/31 Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Jeremie BOUSQUET
>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Community,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to release my contrib project to nexus staging but 
>>>>>>>>>>>> having
>>>>>>>>>>>> difficulties.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Couldn't manage to "git push" correctly from maven to github 
>>>>>>>>>>>> (though
>>>>>>>>>>>> "git push" command-line works), so I use "-DpushChanges=false" 
>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>> release:prepare and release:perform, and do a "git push" manually
>>>>>>>>>>>> after release:prepare.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You sure you <scm> is right ? I see you indicated the https in
>>>>>>>>>>> <developerConnection>, you should probably use the ssh one instead.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Now getting that during release:perform (***** were added, it's a
>>>>>>>>>>>> correct path behind) :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>   [INFO] --- maven-enforcer-plugin:1.0.1:enforce
>>>>>>>>>>>> (enforce-javadoc-exists) @ xwiki-contrib-mailarchive ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>   [WARNING] Rule 0:
>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.EvaluateBeanshell failed with
>>>>>>>>>>>> message:
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Couldn't evaluate condition: ("pom" != "jar") || ("pom" == "jar"
>>>>>>>>>>>> && new 
>>>>>>>>>>>> java.io.File("C:\*****\target\checkout\target/xwiki-contrib-mailarchive-0.1-javadoc.jar").exists())
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course javadoc does not exist at this level, as I'm trying to
>>>>>>>>>>>> release from root aggregator. What I don't understand is why the
>>>>>>>>>>>> enforcer rule fails ? Aggregator is of type "pom" as expected.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> My command-line was:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> mvn release:perform -DpushChanges=false
>>>>>>>>>>>> -DconnectionUrl=scm:git:https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/xwiki-application-mailarchive.git
>>>>>>>>>>>> -Dtag=xwiki-contrib-mailarchive-0.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeremie
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2012/8/17 Jeremie BOUSQUET <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Vincent,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I saw that, no problem I'll update the groupId before doing the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Br,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeremie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2012/8/16 Vincent Massol <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jeremie,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In case you haven't followed we've updated the contrib rule for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the maven group id, see
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be great if you could update your groupid before you do 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the first release :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 16, 2012, at 9:50 AM, Jeremie BOUSQUET wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Vincent & Sergiu,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, is it ok if I put docs to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/MailArchive/Documentation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and others in same space) ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By now I've almost finished writing first versions of:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * MailArchive.Documentation (home page)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * MailArchive.UserGuide
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * MailArchive.AdminGuide
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * MailArchive.OperationsGuide
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * MailArchive.TroubleShooting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I should be able to release 0.1 soon ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Br,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeremie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2012/8/13 Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Vincent Massol 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 13, 2012, at 3:17 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jeremie and all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Back from holidays too :) Cool to see progress on this!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok I've parsed this thread and here's my take:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA: I'll create a dedicated JIRA project since the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project seems large enough to warrant it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok, Thomas is doing it ATM, should be ready real soon :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done, http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XMAILARCH. You should have 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights to do pretty much anything in this project.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Documentation: our rule is currently to have pages on 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extensions.xwiki.org and if the project becomes too large to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create a dedicated wiki for it, as we've done for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rendering.xwiki.org, commons.xwiki.org, enterprise, etc for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> example (see 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome). IMO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's ok ATM to have several pages on e.x.o for the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MailArchive application and we can decide later on to move 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to its own wiki (after we have a 1.0 released IMO).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Nexus: I'll create an account for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see you already have a user, cool.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is that ok?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 10, 2012, at 9:51 AM, Jeremie BOUSQUET wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'd say that:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There should be some documentation on the extension 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page, at least a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> description of the project, some usage scenarios, some 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> screenshots, and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> list of the features
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - I agree that the full documentation should be included 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the application
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - The same full documentation should also be available 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> online, and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contrib wiki seems to be the right place (in a dedicated 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> space)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it's the best solution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since the space I currently use for the main pages of my 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> app is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "MailArchive", I would propose to use the same for the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> space and put pages under:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/MailArchive/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That way publishing the doc online to contrib wiki would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> straightforward with selective import.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Br,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeremie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2012/8/9 Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/09/2012 10:38 AM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/09/2012 04:34 PM, Jeremie BOUSQUET wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Humm ... Just thinking I might put that directly inside 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my app xar ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm a big fan of self-documenting applications. It has 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> advantage of always offering documentation matching the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version in use.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But you might also want to offer the latest released 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation online. I think there are some extensions 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation that spans several pages, but honestly I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't know if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this is something we want/we agreed upon. I'll leave it 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to others to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bring more information on this subject. There is the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contrib wiki also
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which could be a candidate.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've seen extensions with a lot of documentation on their 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extension page,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and I've seen things documented in several places. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I don't like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> huge extension pages.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'd say that:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There should be some documentation on the extension 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page, at least a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> description of the project, some usage scenarios, some 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> screenshots, and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> list of the features
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - I agree that the full documentation should be included 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the application
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - The same full documentation should also be available 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> online, and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contrib wiki seems to be the right place (in a dedicated 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> space)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2012/8/9 Jeremie BOUSQUET <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Jerome,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another thing about this project: I'd like to prepare 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particularly the user guide part, so it's available 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when I'll publish
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the extension.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For this particular use-case though, I'd like to extend 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the user/admin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guide part on more than one page, as it may be quite 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> large.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where should I put these pages ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeremie
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to