Hi Paul, Yes, you are right. I have hidden the debug stuff and it is now only visible if you manually add &debug=on/true/whatever to the URL.
About query boost, we can discuss more about it. It actually sets the "qf" (Query Fields) parameter that basically says what (space separated) fields to query and what boost to attach to each of them. Thanks, Eduard On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Paul Libbrecht <[email protected]> wrote: > Eduard, > > that's nice to see it progresses. I have not had the time to review but > the screenshot help me do so quickly. > > Small comments: > - Do you want to keep debug always on? > I would disable the debug links and checkbox for normal users, > activating if globalAdmin or if a setting is defined > - Query boost does not sound right to me. I'd name this "query form" or > "query expansion" (the boost is a single exponent) > > For sure my +1 for you to merge and make it the default. > > I wonder if there's a hope to disable the Lucene plugin one day since > probably many elaborate infrastructures have come to rely on it. > > paul > > Le 5 nov. 2012 à 12:27, Eduard Moraru a écrit : > > > I`ve also attached a few screenshots to the original jira issue if > anybody > > is interested. > > > > Please see http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-5676 > > > > Thanks, > > Eduard > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> I've played a bit with it and looks really nice (especially the > highlight > >> feature and the ability to filter) > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Caty > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Jerome Velociter <[email protected] > >>> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Edy, > >>> > >>> This is great. I've seen you've fixed the lock issue ; I have had that > >>> issue when working on the 4.0 branch, I will merge it there and test > the > >>> migration. In any case I would like to continue this migration as my > time > >>> allows. My objective is to play with the new spatial submodule (which > is > >>> also integrated in solr as I understand) and try and contribute a > >> "LatLon" > >>> XClass property type. > >>> > >>> +1 for going forward with Solr, > >>> > >>> Jerome > >>> > >>> > >>> On 11/05/2012 11:26 AM, Eduard Moraru wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi devs, > >>>> > >>>> I would like your vote on merging the 'feature-solr-search' branch > with > >>>> 'master' for 4.3M2 as planned in the Roadmap. > >>>> > >>>> Merge Notes: > >>>> - A first version of the Solr search is bundled by default as > >> experimental > >>>> with XE, but Lucene is still the default search engine. > >>>> --- Lucene has been upgraded to 3.6.1 [1] and Solr has been downgraded > >> to > >>>> the same (3.6.1) version in order to achieve the peaceful cohabitation > >>>> between the 2 search versions. If we want Solr 4.0, we need to work a > >> bit > >>>> more on the Lucene search, since Lucene 4.0 comes with a considerable > >>>> number of refactorings. > >>>> ----- I have just noticed Jerome's feature-lucene-4.0.0-upgrade [2] > >>>> branch. > >>>> - The admin needs to use the Search Administration to switch from > Lucene > >>>> to > >>>> Solr and back. (each engine has its own index) > >>>> - The back-end contains a SolrIndex for add/delete operations and a > >>>> QueryExecutor to query the index trough XWiki's Query API using the > >> 'solr' > >>>> language. > >>>> - Indexing is only manually performed for now, from the Search > >>>> Administration, blocking the request until the operation is complete. > >>>> - Search highlighting is available > >>>> - The default search looks only for Documents. Filtered/Advanced > search > >>>> options can be used to change some of the search parameters. > >>>> - Lucene/Solr syntax is supported in the query string > >>>> - Faceted search is currently hidden because it is not yet in an > usable > >>>> state. > >>>> - SearchSuggest is still using Lucene, no matter what the > configuration > >> in > >>>> Search Administration says > >>>> - The merge also contains a fix for a pretty nasty yet easily fixable > >>>> Lucene deadlock [3] (introduced 10 months ago) and some Search Admin > UI > >>>> improvements [4] > >>>> > >>>> The pull requests [5][6] are available for reviewing so start shooting > >> :) > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Eduard > >>>> > >>>> ---------- > >>>> [1] http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/**XWIKI-8407< > >> http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-8407> > >>>> [2] > >>>> https://github.com/xwiki/**xwiki-platform/tree/feature-** > >>>> lucene-4.0.0-upgrade< > >> > https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/tree/feature-lucene-4.0.0-upgrade> > >>>> [3] http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/**XWIKI-8406< > >> http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-8406> > >>>> [4] http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/**XWIKI-8408< > >> http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-8408> > >>>> [5] https://github.com/xwiki/**xwiki-platform/pull/73< > >> https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/73> > >>>> [6] https://github.com/xwiki/**xwiki-enterprise/pull/34< > >> https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-enterprise/pull/34> > >>>> ______________________________**_________________ > >>>> devs mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> http://lists.xwiki.org/**mailman/listinfo/devs< > >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs> > >>>> > >>> > >>> ______________________________**_________________ > >>> devs mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://lists.xwiki.org/**mailman/listinfo/devs< > >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs> > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> devs mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > devs mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
