Hi, On Dec 7, 2012, at 9:59 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi devs, > > We've moved more and more toward an UTF-8-only application, and XWiki > has only been tested with this configuration for several years. > > I propose that we require UTF-8 for a valid, supported installation. > This means: > - JVM encoding (-Dfile.encoding=UTF8) > - Container default URL encoding (Tomcat has ISO-8859-1 by default) > - Database encoding (MySql is still configured with latin1 on some distros) > > There's one big site to update on our side: xwiki.org. > > Here's my +1. This is a move toward a future web, since more and more > standards require (or at least assume as a default) UTF-8. > > > > After thinking a bit more, it would make sense to require a valid > Unicode encoding, including UTF-16, which is preferable in countries > that don't use a latin alphabet. However, XWiki doesn't currently work > under 16-bit encodings at all. For XWiki 4.x I'm -1 since it's a big change and we don't want to break our users that currently use 4.x with ISO8859-1 for example For XWiki 5.x I'm not sure. To be able to answer I need to understand more. For example what currently doesn't work with any encoding the user wants to use? Shouldn't we just be transparent and use whatever encoding is specified and not hardcode anything? Thanks -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
