+1, sounds good
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/08/2012 09:12 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: > > Hi devs, > > > > This week end I've been (at last) experimenting with Mockito ( > http://docs.mockito.googlecode.com/hg/latest/org/mockito/Mockito.html) > and it's been successful so far :) > > > > I've converted a first test to use it as a demonstrator of its power ( > http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XCOMMONS-316): > > > https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/commit/7b45b48de1c6915294736dfddda7479213e754fd > > > > I'd like to propose to start using it and start writing our tests with > it since: > > * It's very easy to use. I was able to very simply migrate an existing > test to it > > * It makes our tests much more readable to read and maintain IMO because > 1) there's less boilerplate code, 2) it provides default values for mocks > and 3) no more of ugly expectations syntax > > * It's powerful, just see > http://docs.mockito.googlecode.com/hg/latest/org/mockito/Mockito.html > > * It's actively maintained and developed, see > http://code.google.com/p/mockito/downloads/list and > http://code.google.com/p/mockito/source/list and > http://code.google.com/p/mockito/people/list > > > > After we've written/converted a few tests (let's say in 1 month or so) > we can really decide if we like it and make it our official mocking tool or > if we should go back to JMock (but I have little doubts ;)). > > > > WDYT? > > Looks good, +1. > > -- > Sergiu Dumitriu > http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Denis Gervalle SOFTEC sa - CEO eGuilde sarl - CTO _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
