Hi Marius, On 29 May 2014 at 07:35:24, Marius Dumitru Florea ([email protected](mailto:[email protected])) wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 4:19 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi devs, > > > > Right now our practice in XWiki Platform for the apps we develop is to move > > to storing all the pages of an app in a single space. > > > > See > > http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/ApplicationDevelopmentBestPractices, > > specifically: > > > > “ > > Generally, put all your pages in a single space dedicated for the > > application you're developing (e.g. Faq, Scheduler, IRC, AppWithinMinutes, > > etc). The name must be as short as possible while still being > > understandable of course and without overusing abbreviations. > > " > > > > Now there are potentially some use cases that may warrant to have 2 spaces: > > one for the content documents and one for the technical documents: > > - ability to easily set permissions on all technical pages so that only a > > group of person can modify them but allow another group of persons to edit > > the content pages (e.g. for the Blog application) > > - easier to remove all the content pages of an app but still keep the app > > working > > > > So one idea would be systematically have 2 spaces for apps: > > - one XXX space (e.g. Blog space) for holding content pages > > - one XXXCode space (e.g. BlogCode space) for holding technical pages > > > > Of course all technical pages are hidden and thus the XXXCode space will > > not appear in the list of spaces or searches by default. > > > > > WDYT? Would you be ok to modify all our existing apps to go in that > > direction? > > I'm not sure this fits all the applications. E.g. Activity stream, > Administration, Annotations. It makes (more) sense when the > application creates data documents that the user is aware of and which > he can edit directly. The user goes to each document to view and edit > it. The application doesn't make changes on his behalf, under the > hood. > > +1 for having a dedicated code space in this case. I’m assuming you were answering to the following which was in my last email " Yes indeed. So let’s refine the definition: - one XXX space (e.g. Blog space) for holding content pages and UI pages - one XXXCode space (e.g. BlogCode space) for holding technical pages Thanks -Vincent “ In the case of applications that don’t produce content pages and that don’t have any UI pages, they’d just use a XXXCode space and there would be no XXX space. For example the Activity Stream app has no UI and doesn’t produce any content page so indeed its 2 pages would go in the ActivityStreamCode space. WDYT? Thanks -Vincent > > Note: A future solution is to use nested spaces but even with nested spaces > > the need for 2 spaces would be the same. We would just need to make the > > XXXCode space a subspace of the XXX space (assuming we can set permissions > > on subspaces ;)). > > > > Thanks > > -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

