Ok for both too.

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> I recently added two modules (on a branch, see
> https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/commit/de32b71e315def995b5f21b7033930a0309caa97
> ) that generate webjars and I'm not sure whether the names I've used
> are good enough:
>
> xwiki-platform-job-web
> xwiki-platform-tree-widget
>
> Thomas made me realize that -web suffix is confusing because we use it
> for modules that generate a WAR. I didn't use -widget for the first
> because it's not a widget (unlike the tree) but some JavaScript API.
> An alternative I had in mind and which was also suggested by Thomas is
> -webjar but we normally don't put the packaging type as suffix. We
> have -ui and not -xar for instance.
>
> So WDYT?
>
> (1) Is -webjar a good suffix for modules that generate a webjar?
>
> (2) If yes, then should it be used for all webjar modules? I.e. rename
> -widget to -webjar
>
> I'd say yes for both.
>
> Thanks,
> Marius
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs



-- 
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to