Hi Guillaume. I've added your idea to the proposal: http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/NestedMenuReorganization#H1.3:1.12B1.2
Too me, there is too many menus in that case. 2015-10-01 14:12 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Lerouge <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > one quick question (maybe it's dumb but it crossed my mind while looking at > the proposals): what about implementing both a "viewers" and a "cog" button > (pushing the total to up to 5 buttons when you have all possible rights)? > > Could this make sense? > > Thanks, > > Guillaume > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > With 7.2, the content menus have changed a lot. The pain point is that we > > have a too much crowded "more actions" menu. > > > > Some discussions have already been done on this jira issue: > > http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-12587 > > > > Caty have created a design page to re-organize the menus: > > http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/NestedMenuReorganization > > > > I'm in favor of the solution 1.2. > > > > So: > > > > * -0 for solution 1.1 since the viewers are not what we use the most > > (thanks to the extra tabs on the bottom) and it gives them too much > > importance > > * +1 for solution 1.2, even if we might encounter some difficulties > saying > > if an item is a base action or an advanced one. > > > > * 0 for option A (too much clicks), but on the other hand I don't have an > > alternative to propose. > > * +1 for option B. The jira issue is already created ( > > http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-12636) and I think nobody would be > > opposed to this. > > * +0 for option C. The browser already have this ability, and yes, it > > implies the hiding of the panels (thanks to some CSS we have). However, I > > remember a client using this feature for a convoluted use-case: include a > > light wiki page in an other website via an iframe. Anyway, we could still > > keep the viewer but remove the link. > > * +1 for D. I know that security through obscurity is not the best, but > it > > disturbs me to let an access to the source code of any wiki page, > including > > not-well-done applications created by users. > > > > Thanks, > > Guillaume > > > > -- > > Guillaume Delhumeau ([email protected]) > > Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS > > Committer on the XWiki.org project > > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Guillaume Delhumeau ([email protected]) Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS Committer on the XWiki.org project _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
