On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 1:01 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi devs, > > > I think that for data that are both not critical and high volume we should > use ElasticSearch instead of saving them in our RDBMS. > Why ElasticSearch and not Solr or something else? There are many comparisons on the web between these two. I wouldn't chose one or another without an investigation. I agree that data that are both not critical and high volume could be stored outside our RDBMS. Thanks, Marius > > So the idea would be to have an embedded ES in XWiki by default (using the > permanent directory to store its data) and admins could configure XWiki to > use a separate ES instance (very similar to what we do with SOLR). > > Whenever a user modifies/creates/deletes/does operations on XObjects/etc, > this is sent to ES. > > The AS UI queries ES to display the data. > > The Stats UI does the same. > > Pros: > - scalability > - performance > - extensibility. It’s easy to evolve the schema in ES, and we can easily > have several formats (as was proven by the Active Installs code) > > I’d like to start a POC in my “free” time. > > WDYT? > > Thanks > -Vincent > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
