Hi Paul,

On 27 Nov 2015 at 13:06:20, Paul Libbrecht 
([email protected](mailto:[email protected])) wrote:

> Hello all,
>  
> Caleb thus wrote:
> > I would say generally speaking the longer we wait to align our syntax
> > with markdown the more non-standard and irrelvant our syntax will become.
> This is pretty harsh. Do you know if others are doing such a slow
> convergence?
> I think Markdown is great for elementary tasks such as a readme but I've
> seen it fail for bigger (and long term) things.
> > If we were building XWiki from scratch today, we would be royal fools not
> > to adhere to what is essentially a universal standard for syntax.
> Erm... provided it would do all we wish it to do.
>  
> E.g. I've never seen "macros" in markdown be put to use in widespread
> infrastructures whereas many wiki syntaxes have some (GitHub has none as
> far as I can tell).
>  
> Addressing that point might answer Guillaume's original intent, which
> seems to answer a fairly precise desire. In particular, I'd be quite
> fine if we enriched our MarkDown processor with some forms of macros but
> nothing more of the xwiki syntax.

See http://rendering.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Markdown11 :)

Thanks
-Vincent

> I've always seen markdown as "when it's simple I use it" otherwise, just
> don't bother and use html.
> Guillaume, should that be broken? I'd understand yes, but please confirm.
> Also, how would you have recognition? E.g. how should the table syntax
> be recognized?
>  
> paul
>  
> > But even though we're not building it today, many people are trying it
> > today and for someone who doesn't know or care about the bad old days
> > before markup was standardized, we're just another incompatible format
> > with no significant market share.
> >
> > Same story is true for Bootstrap. 5 years ago there was no coherent
> > standard, now there is.
> >
> > tl;dr it sucks but we have to.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Caleb
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> > Guillaume Lerouge  
> > 25 novembre 2015 09:05
> > Hi Devs,
> >
> > as you probably noticed it, Markdown has recently become somewhat of a
> > reference syntax for many developer tools, most notably GitHub. I have
> > recently discussed with teams using XWiki who are also using GitHub and
> > Slack and who are interested in being able to use Markdown syntax inside
> > XWiki.
> >
> > Although it is already possible to use Markdown syntax in XWiki in a
> > limited way , I
> > don't think that a wiki could really work with only Markdown, due to the
> > following limitations:
> >
> > 1. We have invested a lot in the XWiki rendering and the XWiki 2.1
> > syntax in order to make them address a lot of use cases and work
> > seamlessly
> > with the WYSIWYG editor
> > 2. Conversely, Markdown syntax is very limited by design
> > and does not
> > support many of the important features of XWiki syntax, forcing users to
> > rely on HTML for a lot of use cases
> >
> > What's interesting however is that Markdown syntax is very close to XWiki
> > syntax in a number of regards, notably line breaks, bold and lists. Some
> > notable differences include the syntax for links, images and code blocks.
> >
> > My line of thinking is the following: what if we made it possible as an
> > option for users of XWiki 2.1 syntax to have XWiki interpret the main
> > elements of Markdown syntax? In practice, this would mean adding a set of
> > 5-10 additional rules to the rendering engine.
> >
> > The obvious benefit would be to improve adoption of XWiki by dev teams who
> > are already familiar with Markdown. I don't see any obvious drawbacks
> > (besides the need to code and maintain the feature of course), but I
> > clearly don't master all the subtleties of the XWiki rendering engine.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Guillaume
> > _______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>  
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to