+1 for the first proposal. Having informations in the github repo is more friendly.
2016-02-10 14:53 GMT+01:00 [email protected] <[email protected]>: > Hi Alex, > > On 10 Feb 2016 at 14:43:53, Alexandru Cotiuga ([email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])) wrote: > > > + 1 > > I would also propose to add the Java version needed for release (instead > of > > digging in the hierarchy to find out this information) > > I don’t agree. I think we should only put the minimal number of > information as it’s very tedious to ensure that the info is in sync. Right > now I’ve put only what I think is the minimal info. Also the Java version > is checked during the build so you cannot have it wrong. > > OTOH I see there’s a link to Translations on l10n. I think that’s a good > idea for apps that support internationalization. Would be optional. > > > and maybe there are > > some other particular steps to follow when a release is performed. > > The template is about the minimal that need to be displayed. We should > mention that of course each repo should add whatever information it > needs/wants to that README. > > > A good > > example would be: > > > https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/application-filemanager/blob/master/README.md > > Thanks > -Vincent > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Guillaume Delhumeau ([email protected]) Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS Committer on the XWiki.org project _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
