On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 in general. > >> On 16 Jun 2016, at 10:57, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]> wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> Also, if we retire the jira project, it means that we stop the support for >>> this application (since no new issues can be created), effectively retiring >>> the whole application itself, not only its jira project. >>> >>> I`m not sure if we currently have a documented process for retiring contrib >>> extensions, but we should at least update the descriptions (and maybe title >>> as well - marking it [Retired]) on the e.x.o. page and on the contrib repo >>> to clearly mention that the app is no longer actively supported by anyone. >> >> We don't have any process. We actually never done it before. What we >> could easily do is add a property in ExtensionClass to indicate an >> extension is retired in which case: >> * the extension does not appear in EM anymore (i.e. make the extension >> "invalid") since that's something we want for this kind of extension I >> think >> * the extension sheet make clear it's retired with some visible marker >> in the title and some warning at the beginning of the content > > Or simply remove the extension from e.x.o. I don’t think they should even be > visible on e.x.o since they’ll be visible when someone filters or searches > for extensions and will potentially confuse the user (even with the > banner/warnings). > > If we want to keep it visible I’d not mix them with other extensions in the > LT but instead I'd introduce another page for retired extensions and we’d add > a link to retired extensions on e.x.o home page somewher. > > I think we need an agreement from authors in order to mark an extension as > retired. We could say that we ask on the list for an agreement putting in cc > the authors (when we have their email addresses) and if we don’t get any > answer in 2 weeks, we go ahead and retire it. If they say they still want to > maintain it, we keep it.
> We could say that we ask on the list for an agreement That's what Alex did :) Just need to tell authors to answer to his mail, but not sure what it would mean for "Groupe Glon" here. > > WDYT? > > Thanks > -Vincent > > >> P.S.: The link to the new old jira project would still need to be added to >>> the e.x.o page since it`s currently missing. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Eduard >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Alexandru Cotiuga < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi devs, >>>> >>>> Currently, the Meeting Manager Application [ >>>> >>>> http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Meeting+Manager+Application >>>> ] >>>> is marked, with a warning, as "This application is superseded by the >>>> Meeting >>>> Application". The application is written in xwiki/1.0 syntax and is full of >>>> deprecated usages which makes it unusable at least since XWiki 6.2. >>>> >>>> Considering the above reasons I propose to retire the MEETING Jira project. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Alex > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
