+1

Thanks,
Alex

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1 for adding any source of contributions as long as it's automated or
> close to automated (like executing one command/request and
> copy/pasting the result)
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Marius
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi devs,
> >>
> >> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release
> notes.
> >>
> >> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates
> in
> >> one way or another to a release, and not just developers.
> >>
> >> I can think of 3 more items to add:
> >>
> >> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
> >> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to
> report
> >> an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality
> of
> >> the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also
> >> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been
> >> committers or leave them in.
> >>
> >> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of
> the
> >> release development.
> >>
> >> Ideally we would also ack:
> >>
> >> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
> >> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made
> it
> >> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also
> commits
> >> some code and often she’s recognised through commits.
> >>
> >> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could
> do
> >> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development
> (when
> >> they help) instead of doing it at the end.
> >>
> >> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add
> >> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
> >>
> >> WDYT?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> -Vincent
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
>

Reply via email to