My vision is that in the future we will have more Flavors supported, not just the KB one. I'm sure we would want to have at least one more flavor for Development, for example. So what will be the strategy? will we provide packaging for all the "support" Flavors? The argument would be the same, having the jetty package will be easier to use and test on it.
Thanks, Caty On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > > >> On 4 Apr 2017, at 11:48, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi dev, > >> > >> The title say it all. > >> > >> The whole point of Knowledge Base flavor move is to stop maintaining a > >> set of install packages and only provide the flavor. > > > > For me there’s a difference between the flavor and the packaging we > propose. The goal of the flavor is not stop maintaining packagings but to > offer various content > > It's possible you are mixing stuff here. I'm not talking about stop > providing any jetty/hsqldb package, you would have the XWiki one on > which you are asked which flavor you want. I'm only talking about a > special Knowledge Base one. > > > > >> Now it could be a pain for testers to have to install the flavor every > >> time so we might still release a jetty/hsqldb package but not list it > >> on http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download for example. > >> > >> WDYT ? > > > > This packaging is one of the most widely used because it’s one of the > simplest to get started with XWiki. > > > > See the green share on http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/ > bin/temp/space/page/chart/1795539013.png > > > > So I think we should definitely keep it. > > > > Thanks > > -Vincent > > > >> > >> I would prefer to avoid that but I can understand if others think it's > required. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> -- > >> Thomas Mortagne > > > > > > -- > Thomas Mortagne >
