Hi Paul,

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:29 AM, Paul Libbrecht <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello Sarthak,
>
> so what’s your next steps?
>
> It was recommended to endorse an issue. That could be one way to start.
>
> But maybe before that, you could create one or two own applications beyond
> simple tutorials that would empower you with the tricks of page rendering?
>
> ​
I am not able to figure out what type of application should I develop.
Could you please provide me with some ideas, so that I am able to form a
mini proposal for myself and then work on it. I can come up with some ideas
but I don't know if it will take me in the right direction or not.

Thanks :)
Sarthak
​

> paul
>
> > On 15 May 2017, at 20:45, Sarthak Gupta <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Vincent,
> > I am done with the FAQ tutorial. I now have the basic idea that how a
> page
> > in XWiki is created. Though I am facing some difficulty with the syntax,
> > but I know it will come with time. :)
> > As far as I have understood there are generally two ways to create an
> > application in xwiki. The first one is by simply using AWM and another
> one
> > is by declaring data xobject(classes), following procedures afterward and
> > writing codes which certainly add more to the application.
> >
> > I saw some slides by Guillaume Delhumeau about using velocity in XWiki.
> > Those have helped me a lot(Thanks, Guillaume!!).
> >
> > I went through the following things
> >
> >  - Continuous Integration doc. I understood the technique of Binary
> >  Dependency builds.
> >  - Coding styles on each of the languages that are used.
> >  - Back-end Development Practices:
> >     - Component module documentation.(I have to understand it more
> >     clearly, maybe later).
> >  - Front-end Dev Practices.
> >  - Building XWiki from sources.(Looked it in Application period too).
> >  - Basic Idea how testing is done. In a nutshell, each and everything is
> >  tested at each subsequent stage.
> >
> > I have already asked most of my small doubts on IRC(some of them were
> silly
> > :P).
> > New IRC Handle: sarthakg
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Sarthak Gupta
> >
>
>

Reply via email to